Which Game is Right For You?

 

This is a contribution from poker pro Matt Marietta.

Matt is an author at Rakeback.com You can view his full biography here.

Which Game is Right for You?

New to poker and aren’t quite sure which type of game to start off with?  This is a common question amongst up poker beginners. Your choices are Sit ‘n Go’s, cash games, or multi table tournaments.  All being quite different from each other, it ultimately depends on what type of player you are.

 

Read more of this post

My Complete Poker Manifesto, Parts I-XV

Part I: My Poker Story Read more of this post

My Complete Poker Manifesto, Part XII: Playing Online Poker

lock poker table

Cash Game Action at Lock Poker

Part XI: Studying The Game of Poker

I play a majority of my poker sessions in the online poker arena.

Playing online has several distinct advantages:

  • ·         The ability to play any stakes ranging from penny games to $100,000 buy-in cash games.
  • ·         The ability to play 24/7.
  • ·         The ability to play a variety of opponents around the globe.
  • ·         The ability to play more than one table at once.
  • ·         The ability to play heads-up against a single opponent in a heads-up cash game
  • ·         The ability to play tournaments and cash-games at the same time.
  • ·         The ability to make money from anywhere there is an internet connection. Read more of this post

My Complete Poker Manifesto, Part VIII: Cash-Game Approaches

online poker tables

A Nice Setup for Multi-Tabling

Part VII: Playing Each Poker Session

Most of my profit from poker has been generated from multi-tabling online cash games.

I play cash games strictly for profit and I don’t think cash games are quite as fun as tournaments for a few different reasons. In cash games, especially when multi-tabling, I run into the same opponents a lot. In the higher stakes, I know for certain the good regulars in these games are keeping great notes on me and developing reads. Because of this, I lose the chance to make profit off them in the long-run because they will adjust to my play constantly. Read more of this post

Traits of Above Average Poker Players

Tom Dwan: The Most Aggressive Poker Player on The Planet

90% of all poker players are long-term losers.

Only 10% of people who play poker are proven to be winners over the long term.

Why is this?

What separates this small percentage of players from the rest?

The answer is simple. They have studied and applied their game more than 90% of their competition.

When I first started playing poker, I belonged in that 90%. I knew how to play the game, and I knew what it took to win, but my wins weren’t sustainable long-term. I knew I would have to study and constantly adjust my game to get better.

It was a long process, but it was well worth the time and I have gained a lot of life lessons from becoming a better poker player.

In order to be a long-term winner, you will need to develop the following traits:

1. An ability to maintain attentional focus for long periods of a time.

2. An understanding of the deeply statistical nature of the game.

3. A sense of confidence and trust in your abilities

and most importantly:

4. A near RECKLESS disdain for money.

Money has no value on the poker table. The game is played with chips.  Whatever money those chips represent doesn’t and shouldn’t have any effect on how you play the game.

If you are concerned with money, you wont be playing poker the right way. You will be playing with scared money and as the saying goes,

“Scared money don’t make no money!”

To be a big long-term winner in poker you must develop a SUPER-AGGRESSIVE playing style, sometimes known as LAG (Loose-Aggressive)

Here is my article on how to develop into a LAG.

Being aggressive doesn’t necessarily mean success. You have to know when to be aggressive, and when to slow down. Against certain opponents, especially ones who can’t fold a hand, being aggressive will lose you money.

Poker is always about adjusting. You need to adjust to each player at the table and your perceived table image.

Being aggressive has a few benefits:

1. You will win more pots where you don’t have the best hand

2. You will make more money in pots that you have the best hand

3. Your opponents won’t be able to accurately deduct your hand-range

If you are playing tight, you opponents will know you have the goods when you bet, and you wont win big pots. You will also not be able to pick up pots where you don’t have the best hand because you won’t be willing to bluff a lot.

That’s the beauty of poker.

You don’t need cards to win.

In fact, cards are somewhat meaningless if you have accurate reads on your opponents and you can figure out what their cards are and they have no idea what you have.

Annette Obrestad

Annette Obrestad is a young professional poker player that proved this.

In one online tournament of 180 players, she covered her hole cards the entire time. She never once looked at her cards.

Guess what?

She won the entire tournament.

She demonstrated perfectly how important reading abilities are and how unimportant cards are.

Just imagine how good this girl is when she actually looks at her cards.

She built a bankroll from $0 to over $1,000,000 by the time she was 18. She never made a single deposit online. She won a free roll tournament to start her bankroll, then NEVER LOOKED BACK.

Quite amazing if you ask me.

When people argue if poker is gambling, they should consult Annette to see what she has to say about that.

Players like Annette, Phil Ivey, and Tom Dwan are perfect examples of players who EXCEL in the aforementioned 4 traits and love to play super aggressive.

They simply don’t care about money.

If you want to be OUTSTANDING at poker you must STAND OUT from the rest of the competition.

Phil Ivey was once quoted as saying “If I have to bet $300,000 on the river with queen high, I don’t care, I fire the trigger.”

Simply Doesn't Care About Money.

Sickening.

Phil Ivey is basically saying here that he is willing to slide in $300,000 worth of chips (the price of a house for some people) on a complete bluff.

I bet if Phil figures he has a 51% chance to win the hand by betting that much on the river, he will make that wager EVERY SINGLE TIME.

That kind of sickness separates the winners from the losers.

You cannot play passively to win in poker.

You must get in there and gamble, but realize when you need to switch gears.

Good luck at the tables! :)

Playing LAG (Loose-Aggressive) in No-Limit Cash-Games to Maximize Profit

Poker has evolved through time and with the growing popularity of online poker in recent years.

In online six-max short-handed cash games, no longer will you find players only raising with premium hands. There is a lot of action pre-flop with raising and re-raising on almost every hand. Wild aggression has become the norm in these no-limit hold’em cash games.

One of the most profitable styles, yet hard to master is a style called LAG (loose-aggressive). Being LAG means you raise and re-raise without premium hands in order to steal a lot of pots you would usually have no interest in. This style requires incredible hand reading ability and the ability to put your opponent on an accurate range of hands.

LAG’s rarely rely on their own hand strength, rather they exploit their opponents perceived hand ranges. They use their table image to their advantage by constantly betting and raising to keep their opponents guessing. When you are very aggressive, opponents have a difficult time putting you on a hand, netting you more profit on your monster hands.

When you have a monster hand and you have been very active, opponents will begin to question if you actually have a good hand. Opponents will be more likely to pay you off not knowing if you are bluffing or betting for value. If you play very tight, opponents will know you must have a big hand and will be more inclined to fold their medium strength inferior hands.

If you have folded the last 20 hands, and now you are betting hard, it is pretty obvious that you have a good holding. You can however pull off well timed bluffs if you are playing TAG (tight-aggressive). Because your perceived image is tight, you can bluff occasionally when you know your opponent will have a hard time calling your bet.

Developing into a LAG is a long process. I recommend a TAG style when you first start to limit your losses. Playing LAG is an extremely high variance playing style. By this, I mean your bankroll is prone to wild swings. Bankroll management is essential, and I wouldn’t recommend playing this style without 50 full buy-ins for the stakes you are playing.

Here is an example of standard LAG play.

No-limit Hold’em six-max deep stack $2/$5 blinds, effective stacks $1000. I have been sitting at the table for about 20 hands and the action has been slightly aggressive with no one getting out of line.

I am on the button with K10 suited of spades. A TAG UTG (under the gun, first position) opponent raises to $15, cutoff flat calls $15, and I raise it up to $75. UTG calls and the cutoff folds.

Pot is $162.

We see a flop of 7,5,9 rainbow. UTG checks and I bet $95. UTG thinks for a while, then calls. At this point, I put my opponent on a range of 10 10, JJ, 777, 555 and 999. My opponents is a tight aggressive player so I believe he would re-raise AA,QQ,KK or AK pre-flop unless he is being very tricky which wouldn’t make sense in a deep-stack game. In a deep-stack game, you don’t want to be slow playing big hands like these because they are vulnerable to be cracked for a monster pot.

I have a program called PokerTracker which gives me every statistic possible on my opponents. My opponents has a VPIP (voluntary put money in pot %) of 11% and a PFR of 8% (pre-flop raise %). These are typical TAG stats and pretty tight for a six-max cash game.

Pot is $352.

Turn comes a 2 of spades. This card doesn’t change much. My opponent checks again, and I fire $175 into the pot. I make a 1/2 pot bet here for two reasons. If I get raised, I can get away from my hand cheap and if he calls, I am setting myself up to pull a monster bluff on a lot of river cards.

He thinks again, and calls.

At this point, I don’t believe he is slow playing a monster hand. Most players will raise a set on the turn, especially TAGs. If he checks the river and I check too, he is losing a ton a value for his hand in a deep stacked match.

If he bets the river big, I can fold for cheap too. If he bets the river, the only possible hands he could have are monsters, like a set of 7s, 5s, or 9s. It wouldn’t make sense to bluff the river in his position because he doesn’t have the initiative in this pot, I do. I am the one representing a big hand and it would be foolish to try to bet the river as a bluff if I do in fact have a monster.

Pot is now $702 and I have $655 left in my stack. River comes an Ace of clubs. He checks quickly and I think for about 20 seconds, and I dump my remaining $655 into the pot. If he was playing tricky and planning to set me up on the river, I am glad to pay him off here as he wont normally be doing this.

My PokerTracker gives me the stat that my opponent check-raises the turn 33% of the time after flat calling the flop and checking the turn. This is a high %, and makes me believe if he is flat calling out of position then raising the turn, he has a monster.

My opponent could easily have JJ or 10 10 here and continued with his over pair on the turn. The river is the perfect bluff card for me.

The ace is a very scary card for my opponents hand range. If he has JJ or 10 10, I don’t think he can ever call this river. I could have easily hit my ace on the river if I had AK,AQ,AJ and was bluffing the flop and the turn. I am not giving him good odds to look me up.

The total pot is $1357 and my opponent also has $655 left. He is getting a little better than 2/1 odds to make the call meaning he has to be right almost 50% of the time. Based on my perceived hand range, this river shove all-in is a no-brainer if you are trying to profit from playing LAG.

I am eligible to have 777,555,999,AAA,222, AK,AQ,AJ here, all of which he has to be worried about. As I said before, I don’t put my opponent on a set as he would usually tell me on the turn with a raise. His passive play on the turn set me up for this bluff.

My opponents thinks for a minute, hits timebank, lets it wind down to 0, then folds. I take down the $1357 pot. He types in the chat box “nice catch.” I respond with a “ty”.

This is just one example of where aggression can land you pots you have no business being in. I would only pull a move like this on a TAG and in position. Position is one of the most important parts of playing LAG. Having position enables you to see what your opponent does first before you have to act. If you have the initiative and position, you can bet the flop, turn and river with nothing if the board gets scary for his perceived hand range.

This might look like a crazy hand and an extremely risky bluff, but based on my opponents statistics, I feel he folds here more than 85% of the time. If he folds 85% of the time and we ran this situation a million times, in the long-run I will technically win $1153.45 each time (85% * $1357). There will be times where he played a monster slow and tricky and I will lose those situations but my overall expected return on this play is +EV (positive expected value).

Because I haven’t gotten out of line or been caught bluffing yet at this table, making this move is completely necessary to drive your opponent out of the pot. As a LAG, you have to take calculated risks and not worry about the outcome. If you are making profitable decisions, in the long-run, you will net yourself profit. Once again, this is where bankroll management comes into play as you need to have a deep roll to risk a lot of chips on bluffs.

I recommend trying this LAG style once you are comfortable with the game and you have shown a profit as a TAG over 10,000 hands of short-handed cash-game play. You have to be honest with yourself on your skill level or you will run the risk of going broke by playing over your head. PokerTracker is absolutely essential for evaluating your own play and getting solid reads on opponents. Without it, all the players online are simply a name with an avatar. You will have no idea of how they are playing.

More Poker Strategy:

The Poker Trance

Top 5 Reasons You Lose at Poker

My Multi-Table Tournament Strategy

Booking the Win at Final Tables

Top 10 Reasons You Should Play Poker

How to Play AA For Maximum Profit

How to Overbet For Massive Value

Additional Strategy, Sports Betting:

The Three Tenets of Profitable Sports Betting