What the Hell Did John Lennon See in Yoko Ono?

This is just one of my random rants that I had to let out. While surfing the internet aimlessly, I came upon some videos regarding Yoko Ono – and yes, she’s a moron.

Some will say she is the true reason that The Beatles broke up, and I wouldn’t doubt it. Yes, there are some other reasons like George Harrison’s emergence as a songwriter and their managers death, but  I would have left the band too if I had to deal with that idiot every day. I hate to say anything negative about John Lennon, but this guy was Yoko Ono’s bitch. He literally brought her everywhere – even the recording studio. This violated a previous agreement between the members not to let wives or girlfriends into the studio. However, Lennon made it clear that she would be allotted artistic input into the band’s recordings. Ono would comment or make suggestions in the recording studio, which only pissed off the rest of the band!

There were times when Lennon even brought her on stage. One example was when Lennon played live with Chuck Berry performing his song Memphis. She had to play her irrelevant drum in the background and even had the balls to pick up a microphone while John Lennon and Chuck Berry were singing. The noises that came out her mouth were horrifying, and I will get back to that  at the end of this rant. 

Comedian Bill Burr explains this incident perfectly and in the funniest way

I understand people fall in love, but come on. John Lennon could have gotten any woman he wanted at the time. What the hell did he see in Yoko Ono? Not only is she an idiot – she’s also really fuckin’ scary to look at. I’m not exaggerating – I literally get scared looking at pictures of her.

yoko ono What the Hell Did John Lennon See in Yoko Ono?

Lady, you’re scarin’ us!

John Lennon’s son, Julian Lennon, also hates Yoko Ono. I really believe that John was the only person who actually liked Yoko. Julian described Yoko Ono as a Manipulative woman who brain washed his father. He explains that:

” she knew exactly what she was doing since day one. She played innocent, but she had it all planned.”

Listen to what he had to say below (forward to 7:00)

So yea, back to those ridiculous noises she makes while “singing”. It almost sounds like a mixture of a dolphin having an orgasm mixed with Dr. Evil’s famous “mwuahahaha” laugh.

Ringo Starr gives you his best impersonation of it:

He does a decent job, but here is the real deal. Yoko Ono does her own version of Katy Perry’s’ song Firework. I have watched this video multiple times, and I still cannot understand what the hell she is doing. Everyone stands around like she is some kind of fancy piece of art taking pictures and clapping for her. Are you kidding me? I would have literally laughed in her face and made her cry – that’s how much these noises irritated me. Watch the video if you really want to – it’s terrible.

yoko ono meme What the Hell Did John Lennon See in Yoko Ono?

About breakinbadd
Hey I excel in just about anything that I try, who am I?

56 Responses to What the Hell Did John Lennon See in Yoko Ono?

  1. OJID says:

    Wow, I thought you were exagerating, as many ranters do, when you said she was making ‘noises’ but that was something else… We have already established that Yoko Ono is a talentless, band-breaking cow but the most shocking and irritating thing is how idiots still honour her with such acolades as ‘experimental artist’ and ‘avant-garde mastermind’, it’s really goes to show that our society still has it’s head up it’s arse when it comes to real art.

    • johnny be good says:

      She has just made thousands of new “unfans” who can’t stand her “music” which has been described at best as the “braying of goats” as witnessed in her disaster performance at Glastonbury:

      http://yuckfoko.livejournal.com/35461.html

      Yoko Ono at Glastonbury – worst live set ever?

      Jul. 5th, 2014 at 9:16 AM

      And then you get the Guardian bending over backwards to make amends by all of her critics who have called a spade a spade: she’s got no talent, she’s shite, she’s been ruining music since given the chance back in 1968. If not for having succeeded in conquering one John Lennon by relentless stalking, drugs and other “techniques” to ensure that John obeyed her every command, she would never ever have been allowed to perform her so called singing at Glastonbury. She’s got John’s money, and continues to live off his fame, so everyone bows down to her like she’s some sort of music tycoon.

  2. Lennonlover says:

    Tried to comment and it didn’t work. Here goes again:
    How come we are all afraid to ask if Yoko had John murdered? Will we get sued for asking the question? It seems like the most likely explanation and to diehard Beatles fans is not so much a why question than a how question. She had all of the motive in the world. Did she love John? Seems like she absolutely detested him and saw him as merely a means to an end. She controlled John through guilt and drugs and hypnosis in which she was skilled. She practiced magik and ran with the denizens of the night world and in that capacity had acess to cults that practiced murder and extortion. She also made about $100 million in less than three years. Some of this money might have come through financing large scale heroin deals. John had become a liability. He was Losing Her, Stepping Out, and getting back with the boys. Can you imagine? Basically, I feel that John’s murder was an act of psychological war on the American/ Brits. Or maybe, it is as it seems, a psychopathic narcisist exercising her plan B.
    Remember, it seems that John pulled himself out of her trap and was getting his head together. He needed time to process his childhood, the insanity of Beatlmania and his own withdrawl into drugs and depression. He took the time for himself and was figuring it out- the muse was back. The last night in the recording studio he spoke of something to Jack Douglas that freaked him so bad that he had to erase the tape. I think that he might have said that Yoko wanted him dead.
    Again, only some diehard Lennon fans will get this. Most will remain clueless. They have been fed disinformation for decades, and they probably buy into the story that rouge elements of the CIA did it. I don’t know, either. I think that you have to follow the money, and look to who had that motive.

    • Beatles Still Rock says:

      HI Lennonlover/Beatleslover,

      I think that John’s murder had been planned for a long time, there was quite a lot of hate built up against John in particular for having made a stand against the Vietnam war. The haters were people like the born again Christian ruled CI@A, the military industrial complex, and many celebrity entertainers like Elvis Presley who exploded with hate at the mention of John Lennon’s name.

      http://www.nationalenquirer.com/celebrity/why-elvis-presley-hated-john-lennons-guts

      So even though Presley died in August 1977, I suspect there still many rightwing entertainers who hated John Lennon and the Beatles not only because of his pacifism, but also because they were simply jealous that the Beatles still received more attention 10 years after their breakup than entertainers such as Frank Sinatra did.

      If anyone familiar with Sinatra knows that he would get help from the “boys” to inflict violence on any perceived rivals. For example, here’s a real story:

      Sinatra warned Comedian Jackie Mason to stop being so funny in his warmup routine before Sinatra came on stage as the main act. Mason kept doing his schtick, so Sinatra decided to “teach him a less” by having the boys pay him a visit which resulted in Mason being beaten up, having a bloody nose, among other things. So going forward, Mason told less funny jokes to make Sinatra happy.

      If Sinatra would call out the muscle for something as small as Mason getting too many laughs and praise, can you imagine what he would do to someone like a rival like Lennon who was still getting far more press and attention and because Beatles’ songs from 10 years earlier were still outselling Sinatra’s?

      Lennon is lucky he didn’t end up with a bullet in the head, so imagine how happy someone like Sinatra and his rightwing buddies were shared a strong hatred of Lennon knowing that they were successful in subduing lennon by getting him to fall in love with and knuckle under to someone as horrible, ugly and just plain awful as Yoko Ono with the droopy boobs that had been squeezed perhaps one too many times during her scissor strip routine on stage and her flabby buttocks that would make any one (man or woman) want to just puke at the sight of her?

      Aside from Yoko’s heavy heroin use and staying up late nights because she was so high from all the heroin and being on the phone constantly and acting like John’s jailer of sorts, I don’t think she was capable of doing sophisticated financing of drug deals.

      However, perhaps she got paid millions of dollars for “allowing” John to be killed, maybe that’s how she made her big money aside from profits made selling properties that John had bought cheaply in the late 70s.

      Who knows? But there was a lot of hate at John and a desperation to make sure that John never got back together with paul and that is was no coincidence that Yoko kidnapped John Lennon the last weekend in January, a week before John was flying down with May Pang to meet up with Paul McCartney to help him out with the recording of his new ‘Venus and Mars’ album in New Orleans.

      I think the CI*A had a role in making sure that the Beatles never got back together again, it was apparently as important as making sure that no Kennedy ever got elected as President again sort of thing.

      There were certain people that were on a list, and John Lennon had pissed off the wrong people.

      Look at what has happened to poor former political talkshow host Keith Olbermann: he had the top rated show on MSNBC and yet MSNBC pulled the plug because he had gone too far in his political criticisms and he had to be punished by being fired. Al Gore then again fired Olbermann too. Now Olbermann’s strong voice has been muzzled and Olbermann has been relegated to a weekly late night ESPN sports newscaster show. What a pity.

      Again, we haven’t lived in a real democracy for many decades and it is truly those who own the gold that make the rules, essentially the very wealthy that “own” this country who decide everything these days. The rest of us are so much cannon fodder who must learn to stay out of their way and keep our heads down.

      I think elements based in the deep south who hated John Lennon for his spouting off about the Beatles being more popular than Jesus were responsible for sponsoring a Yoko style assault that continues to this day on John’s musical and spiritual legacy. Despite Yoko’s attempts to mitigate the extreme bad karma by everything she’s done to John Lennon and the Beatles, she can never ever undo the extreme evil she’s had a hand in, even if someone helped her conquer the mind of John Lennon. As John wrote, “Instant Karma’s gonna get you”, and that includes Yoko and anyone who helped her subdue John Lennon and brainwash him into believing that she was the sun and the earth and the moon and to obey her every order and desire.

      • Beatles Still Rock and Roll says:

        On reflection the day after the last comment, I would venture to say that once John got back in the news headlines with his comeback album ‘Double Fantasy’, and with all the press attention once again on John, maybe there was a rush to end his life before he had a chance to get back together again and record anymore music with the other Beatles, and of course before he had a chance to legally divorce Yoko.

        After all, back in 1975 he and May Pang had just met with a realtor to look at some houses in the Hamptons and John had told May he wanted to setup house with her and get out of her cramped apartment. Yoko could not allow that to happen so she lassoed him back with claims of being pregnant.

        John was absolutely miserable the last few years with Yoko but he carried on for the sake of the deal he made to help raise Sean, so if he had known that Sean wasn’t even his own child he wouldn’t have felt as obligated to keep up the pretense of pretending to be a happily married couple that Yoko wanted everyone to believe. hence part of the reason for naming his last album ‘Double Fantasy’ was just that, their relationship was a complete fantasy made up in Yoko’s mind and the minds of the public but he just let it be on the thought that he could slowly start stepping out and getting his freedom and his life back.

        Of course Yoko couldn’t allow her prisoner to ever leave, and especially allow her prisoner to take his money with him as well, so she was only too happy by whatever dark forces were out there to hasten John’s violent death. I can only say she must not be a very happy person with all the bad things she’s done to John and to others who got in her way.

        So the push was on to silence John and stop him from getting back together with the other Beatles and for Yoko to stop him from leaving her and thus preserve for all time the carefully crafted myth that they were a very happily married couple. She’ll have to live with herself the last look that John gave her as he was dying from the bullets and the realization that she had betrayed him. You might have been able to escape responsibility using Chapman as the patsy, but you can never escape karma for your own actions.

    • Joy Fisher says:

      I always knew yoko was a snake John should have stayed with his first wife instead of wasting his time on this money grubbing gold digger who just wanted attention for herself . I think john might still be alive today if it was not for this fire breathing dragon lady manipulating him.

  3. Beatleslover says:

    Yoko did not love John- she despised him. Why is it that no one can say what really happened to John? I think that we all agree that Mark Chapman seemed hypnotized. Who then, were his handlers? Some people say that he was a CIA-type assasin. Others believe that he was a pawn co-opted by a black cult network whom which Yoko had deep and intimate knowledge. Many will know what I am talking about but millions more will not. I think that Yoko herself was a black widow sent to neutralize the hope of the New Left, but she may have just been a super narcisist sociopath. I use Occam’s razor in this case- she needed John dead, just follow the money. It’s really then more of a question of how and not why.
    Another question- how did she make all of that money? I think that she was a major heroin financer and bankrolled major shipments.
    There may be a major dark side to all of this, a sort of Rosemary’s Baby scenario operating out of the Dakota, and you have to know how these people might operate. We should have strung them all up as Roosevelt have planned.
    I loved John. He was my hero and he was not weak, he was kept sick and controlled. He was recovering though, getting out of the Yoke’s spelll and becoming a major liability once again.
    WAR IS NOT OVER! We owe it to our children’s children’s children to sacrifice our lives if that’s what it takes- we are the only hope.

    • The Yoko Watch says:

      There is also a criminal element involved, check out the latest lawsuit that she lost after ripping off the clothing designs from a fashion designer:

      http://pagesix.com/2014/06/04/yoko-ono-to-pay-designer-over-raunchy-fashion-designs/

      Yoko Ono to pay designer over raunchy fashion
      June 4, 2014

      Yoko Ono has agreed to​ pay a feisty Brooklyn designer who accused her of stealing her raunchy fashion designs, according to papers filed in Brooklyn federal court.

      Despite initially seeking to toss the Brooklyn federal court case ​— trashing it as frivolous, Ono has now agreed to pay Haleh Nematzadeh an undisclosed sum of money to make the copycat case vanish.

      Both sides signed a confidentiality agreement that prohibits them or their lawyers from disclosing the payoff amount or discussing the settlement.

      Nematzadeh claimed in her 2013 civil suit that Ono blatantly ripped off several of her unusual fashion concepts – including placing handprints over the crotch and bosom regions.

      The Bushwick fashionista said she met with photographers for Ono’s design company, Opening Ceremony, in 2012 when they were considering her fashions for use in their catalogue.

      But Nematzadeh said they abruptly cut her off and then used her “works of art” for Ono’s wacky menswear collection,

      Her attorneys initially blasted Nematzadeh’s case, saying “Plaintiffs do not own the exclusive rights to a handprint on the crotch.”

      They also said that handprint designs are as old as humanity itself. “Handprint patterns can be traced back to the earliest cave paintings,” they wrote in a court filing.

      Ono even claimed that she drew inspiration for the the line from her late husband, Beatle icon John Lennon.

      Nematzadeh’s attorney, Aymen Aboushi, did not comment on the case.

      • Beatlelover says:

        Thanks for the reply Yokowatch. I appreciate the timely food for thought. It further serves to ratifiy and contextualize a seming pattern of criminal behavior.

    • What that’s crazy why would yukoo ono want john killed that’s really off the wall I mean anything s possible but come on get real

  4. Benedict Cumberbatch says:

    Here’s the rare Sept 2012 photo of David Spinozza that resulted in a chain of events that led me to take a 2nd look at Sean Lennon’s childhood resemblance to David, and I think there is a very strong resemblance plus Sean has David’s cleft chin:

    http://www.guitarworld.com/session-guitar-my-interview-true-studio-guitar-royalty-david-spinozza
    Notice how he won’t say anything about working with YO.

    It’s 1990 and Sean has already had his first “little” nose job and the cleft chin is in the same place as David spinozza’s cleft chin:
    http://www.corbisimages.com/stock-photo/rights-managed/ZXX649523/sean-lennon-holding-guitar?popup=1

    1996 http://www.davidmcgough.com/photos.php?photo=2458&origin=%2Fphotos.php%3Fsearch%3Dsean%2Blennon%26x%3D27%26y%3D13
    It’s Sean with long, long hair looking very much like a hippie but not looking like John Lennon at all!

    2009 http://www.starpulse.com/Music/Sean_Lennon/gallery/JTM-045830/ “The September Issue” New York City Premiere – Arrivals
    The Museum of Modern Art
    08/19/2009

    2010 http://tinyurl.com/notqlpu
    This was taken on Sean’s 35th bday, Oct 9th, 2010 and notice the scar on his chin where he’s had repeated surgery work to “fill in” the cleft chin from biological dad David Spinozza. Note that the area where the cleft chin was is the same place on David Spinozza’s chin as well. No wonder Sean needs to wear a beard because the filler/scars (where it was removed again) keep showing up and he needs to wear a beard to cover it up.

  5. Benedict Cumberbatch (Sherlock Holmes) says:

    It’s pretty clear to me that Sean has had loads of plastic surgery, wonder if he got hooked on painkillers, if he’s been in a lot of pain, and this line of questioning leads me back to a nagging question that John Lennon had, “was he really my son or someone else’s?”

    Here’s the rare Sept 2012 photo of David Spinozza that resulted in a chain of events that led me to take a 2nd look at Sean Lennon’s childhood resemblance to David, and I think there is a very strong resemblance plus Sean has David’s cleft chin:

    http://www.guitarworld.com/session-guitar-my-interview-true-studio-guitar-royalty-david-spinozza
    Notice how he won’t say anything about working with YO.

    It’s 1990 and Sean has already had his first “little” nose job and the cleft chin is in the same place as David spinozza’s cleft chin:

    http://www.corbisimages.com/stock-photo/rights-managed/ZXX649523/sean-lennon-holding-guitar?popup=1

    1996 http://www.davidmcgough.com/photos.php?photo=2458&origin=%2Fphotos.php%3Fsearch%3Dsean%2Blennon%26x%3D27%26y%3D13
    It’s Sean with long, long hair looking very much like a hippie but not looking like John Lennon at all!

    2009 http://www.starpulse.com/Music/Sean_Lennon/gallery/JTM-045830/
    “The September Issue” New York City Premiere – Arrivals
    The Museum of Modern Art
    08/19/2009

    2010 http://tinyurl.com/notqlpu

    This was taken on Sean’s 35th bday, Oct 9th, 2010 and notice the scar on his chin where he’s had repeated surgery work to “fill in” the cleft chin from biological dad David Spinozza. Note that the area where the cleft chin was is the same place on David Spinozza’s chin as well. No wonder Sean needs to wear a beard because the filler/scars keep showing up and he needs to wear a beard to cover it up.

    If you click on these links you can pull up these photos of Sean that show the progression of his face from 1987 to 2010.

  6. To BreakinBadd: can you let me know if you got the emails that Tim D. (Zazenlife) forwarded you? What did you think?

  7. Anonymous says:

    i agree with most of these malodorous emanations, though i may not be able to personally elucidate my reasons. can any of us actually state “why are all of us concerned about WTF yoko ono is doing now?” this is an octogenarian of little significance (at all!) in 2014. other than her “peace towers” what has she done? exactly, NAFT. right?

    i find it exceedingly interesting that we (including me) are so vehement with our invectives against this woman. somehow she sucks the living hate out from every pore, does she not? but why? she is just a woman!! is she not? is this exactly the type of dialogue she wishes to induce in order to maintain her relevance? perhaps. and if so, it is fairly erudite.

    SHYTE! ok, i HAAAAAAATE her! (lol!) i hate how she looks, how she sounds, how she manipulates, how she lies, how she cheats, and how all around ice-hearted she is!

    can you believe that she (sold and therefore) made julian buy back the postcards to his own father from auction! that she tried to foil julian’s record launch by orchestrating the simultaneous launch of sean’s record? and that she coupled that strategy with threatening radio stations to pull beatle rights if they played any of julian’s songs! that she gave julian only 100′s of dollars per month from his fathers’ near billion dollar estate claiming “he would only get himself into trouble”??!!!! have you ever heard of a TRUST you half-wit? (exactly, she’s no “half-wit”, she just thinks julian is–and that he would believe her greed would be masked by such an insipid rationale.

    this is john’s first born son folks, fighting to make a living for himself and his mother while yoko and sean basque shamelessly, unabashedly in john’s fortune.

    now, just when it seems it cannot get worse, cast a glance at the myriad of tasteless marketing schemes of john’s name and work! (like she needed the money!) then, a simple google search brings to light allegations that yoko ‘manipulated’ many of john’s original works for market! colorized them, etc.! now if that is true, for the life of me i cannot think of a single justification for this! it would be an unforgivable crime! at least work on a copy of the original and call it a joint project–why (allegedly) forge john’s hand?

    julian: “thank’s, yoko, for the john lennon mug you sent me for my birthday!” (that’s right, it what she sent him, while sending the more pricy pieces, engraved on marble, to yoko’s friends.)

    ok. yes. of course i see the reasons we hate this person. they are abundantly clear. although, as ironic as it may sound, i am against this sort of general gossip — that is, without giving a person the opportunity to respond. at last i reason that just as we found this site, so can she–so we have equal rights to this venue.

    anyway, yoko can take the money, buy the sycophants, live in the dakota, keep the private planes, and the publishing rights, etc., but she cannot fool the people. no no, not ever.

    “PEACE AND LOVE!?” yea, whatever yoko. more like “CASH AND CARRY”.

    MAN, i wish john were here.

    i wish he could have seen this.

    do any of you actually believe he would have withstood any of this? one clue will be the ‘lost weekend’ (actually 18 months) when john split with may pang! they were together at least a year and a half! so yoko, what kind of “true love” is that? NOT — just another one of yoke’s thinly veiled attempts to hijack history and brainwash the people.

    her only control was to give him room to get the hell away from her! and she was smart here. she’s obviously been reading her ancestors book, the art of war. maybe in her last life she was a he! miyamoto musashi!

    anyway, let me end this by now boring tirade, we know of your greed yoko! sneaking out to apple headquarters store, armed with arms full of garbage bags, cleaning out the place the night before paul, george, ringo, and their families even had a look! incredible! WHY?

    we know of your manipulations! sending endless pleas to john insisting that he “help” ($$$$$$$) your dying ideas take flight in order to save the world! and you say you didn’t even know the beatles? HAR HAR HAR!!! WHY?

    when your advances to paul (yep! true dat!) were declined, you hit up george, then finally john! did it not bother you at all that you had a daughter? kyoko!!? WHY?

    then you wonder why kyoko kept running away from you!!!! didn’t it bother you (at all!?) that the lads were married? that john had a son!!?? WHY?

    you just had to keep pushing until you got your way!

    well, here you are yoko, you “won” the battles–but what did you win?

    you won lots and lots of money, but you are miserable, aren’t you? WHY?

    because you know in your heart how you did it. and you know, that in spite of all your money and your company of sycophants, we, the people, know as well.

    i’ll be interested to see how much of sean’s inheritance yoko will squander in order to preserve her legacy and fight to make YOKO as important as john?

    do you really think yoko will keep john’s ashes a secret? haha!

    you watch, they will be pulled out and mingled with her own, then built into a huge memorial where anyone wishing to pay their respects to john, will be forced to face YOKO as well.

    this, in my mind, will be her last chance redeem her name, IMO.

    if she allows the populace (or even her son sean) to make their own decisions on the funeral, the monuments/memorials, etc, without undue influence from her personal army PR experts, then she will have gained a little respect from this author.

    that said, a mere 3 minutes and 17 seconds at:

    http://youtu.be/EaCKKHcpf0w

    would have been more that enough to make the case. this is a mere window onto the land that is YOKO ONO.

    ps. anyone notice that like paul, she wishes to promulgate her own name while minimizing lennon’s? if not, why doesn’t she ever use her legal name? it’s yoko ono LENNON!

    sorry, no time for proof-reading what will surely be a minefield of spelling/grammatical errors.

    • Nancy says:

      Thank you, THANK YOU Anon for providing the Bill Burr video that no longer is available on this post. I LOVED Burr’s commentary, what he said is EXACTLY what I thought when I first saw this show with John playing the song ‘Johnny Be Good’ with Chuck Berry, a song that John had played so many times in seedy Hamburg nightclubs to ‘make show’ (mak shau in german).

      What I don’t get is all the Lennon tribute solo singers who also sell out to Yoko, they make her out to be some kind of goddess gift to men, but she acts like such a negative control freak and looks like one, it makes me wonder when the audience think this is normal.

      After all, John never, ever smiled or laughed once he got tied up with Yoko, and that’s what she did, she emotionally manhandled him, stalked him, gave him the best blow jobs ever in order to get John to come back for more, then got him hooked on heroin, took hundreds of hits of LSD, and kept plotting to isolate him from his Beatles’ past.

      Thank you BreakInnBad for one of the best Yoko rants ever, and please update the bill burr video link because it doesn’t work!

      Also Anon, one thought, why hasn’t anyone commented publically how incredibly sick it is for YO to get son Sean dressed up like his ‘dad’ John Lennon and then appear together as if Sean is the new reborn version of John Lennon? How sick is this? Really !

      While watching the Beatles 50th anniversary special on CBS that was filmed in LA, I couldn’t help but notice how Paul and Ringo were never shown looking at Yoko who was sitting with Sean son aka ‘John Lennon’ lookalike nearby. She grosses me out, just looking at her that night and anytime I see her in the press with those horrible black beady eyes, she looks like a Japanese hit woman who uses really bad mojo to subdue and destroy her enemies. And she had her son Sean looking like John Lennon from the late 60s with the full beard, long hair, glasses and hat. How F’n sick is this? Why doesn’t anyone else bring this up?

      thanks Anon for your recent post.

    • chuck berry's grandson says:

      Also, what makes Yoko even scarier is that she’s managed to edit out that scary WTF look on Chuck Berry’s face on all the youtube videos of that song. I can’t find an unedited version anymore. The Chuck Berry WTF look is gone because Yoko can’t stand any negativity though she’s the Mt. Vernon of bad mojo. As Beatle George once commented back in 1968, “she’s got bad energy”.

  8. fuck yoko says:

    She sounds like porn.

  9. ralph says:

    Where is the love?

  10. Anonymous says:

    Where is the love?

  11. Anonymous says:

    What she’s doing is performance art, it’s not meant to sound like normal music but I guess the idiots posting on here would not get that. Also, she was already an established artist before meeting Lennon. It’s ridiculous that people blame her for breaking up the Beatle because even the surviving members have admitted she wasn’t the reason. Sadly, strong females who do not censor themselves and refuse to fit the mold of a submissive woman will always be critized.

    • Anonymous says:

      Oh please dont bring your feminist crap here. Would you honestly say that that was art? She literally just made noises like a donkey having an orgasm.

    • Anonymous says:

      Yeah, no. Also what do you mean by “surviving members”? The ones that survived Yoko Ono?

    • Ida says:

      She played a very submissive woman. And to force herself into a band that’s been heard of in the US and the rest of the world, (unlike the long established artist before she met Lennon), in order to give her input on their music. What is wrong with this situation is the fact no one cared about Yoko Ono, but they knew who the Beatles were! I have witnessed live performances of this type of “Ugh” singing “?” before in college. I did not like it. I understand that singing involves more than words, except it usually sounds pleasant.
      John Lennon was a drug addict, his drug use made him feel euphoric, but left him incapable of doing nothing but yacking about peace. I saw one interview from 1969 where John Lennon spoke of Hitler and I am sure the concern should have been about Vietnam. Lennon also took Yoko Ono with him to that interview. Like most insecure or conniving women she needed to keep an eye on him. I understand you may be a fan of the arts, but I would not pay to see her. I also play instruments, but I am not a professional. It’s amazing what women mistake for a strong woman these days. A strong woman would not need to keep watch over a man like Yoko did. It is a known fact that even the closet of lovers or partners need to alone! I have been married for over fifteen years and have one teenage daughter. My daughter has musical talent and is opened minded. She also paints, sketches, and does computer graphics. One time I asked her while she was drawing very nice picture if she wanted to be an artist. She said no she wanted to help people, so she decided on being a funeral director. I asked how she made this choice and she said artist’s talk about helping people while posing for pictures. She wants to help the families who experience a loss by talking to them like the funeral director at her grandpa’s funeral. I am proud my daughter admires a real professional.

    • wopak says:

      What about the song “Mommy hiding her hand in the snow” is that some kind of art. If it is I’m Leonardo Da vinci.

  12. Seako says:

    Yoko Ono’s treatment of Julian Lennon show everyone the exact caliber of her being. The situation is like a guy who has a harem and the number one wife has the son who will inherit. Then the conovving second wife comes along, has a son and does all she can to usurp and get rid of the first wife and on.
    Yoko only fans are the ones who admire the money she got off John’s estate. I even feel sorry for Sean. She never wanted him, it was all John. I wish Cynthia Lennon had stood up to them, John and Yoko just for her sons sake. When John died Yoko told her she couldn’t come, but send Julian. That EVERYONE. Des what she says is astonishing! She is the personification of narcissism, delusion, dementia, and evil. She is so insular and out of touch. She never had ANY kind of talent. Never. Conceptual art can be very sophistocated but it can also be the medium if of such mediocre people like her.
    It is a good thing she has all that money because she has to pay people alot to tell her how great she is. The only reason why Paul is buttering her biscuit is to get her to agree to put his name first on the songs

  13. Anonymous says:

    It almost sounds like a mixture of a dolphin having an orgasm mixed with Dr. Evil’s famous “mwuahahaha” laugh. =)))

  14. Doric says:

    If John Lennon wasn’t borderline I don’t know who is. Abandoned by both parents will cause abandonment paranoia and engender feelings of chronic worthlessness, that combined make the suffer abandon close relationships because they fear they are so worthless that they will be abandoned eventually, a pain they cannot tolerate. Triggering self worth issues will make them rage in pain that they often express artistically. They are highly vulnerable to emotional predators who will isolate them from their friends and family to hold sway over them. Julian Lennon believes Yoko is a manipulator that targeted Lennon from the start. That the Beatles split when she arrived and her vulgar exploitation of his estate are red flags. She displays classic narcissistic traits.

  15. Anonymous says:

    I KNOW SHE’S HORRIBLE AND BEFORE PLAYING THE VID I WAS EXPECTING OF A HORRIBLE PRONUNCIATIONS OR OUT OF TUNE SINGING BUT OH MY FUCKING GOD!! SHE’S LIKE A WITCH DOING SOME INCANTATION! AT FIRST I THOUGHT THAT WAS JUST KIND OF A WEIRD INTRO AND I WAS STILL WAITING TO HEAR OF “DO YOU EVER FEEL…” BUT NO, SHE DIDN’T EVEN SING!! SHE’S JUST DOING THIS ALL CRAP OF NOISES THAT IS SOOO IRRITATING! ITS RIDICULOUS THAT PPL EVEN APPLAUDED ON HER, I NEVER COMMENT ON ANYTHING I READ OR WATCHED OVER THE INTERNET BUT I HAVE TO RIGHT NOW BECAUSE SHE ANNOYED THE SHIT OUT OF ME AND WAS SO TRAUMATIZED WITH HER FIREWORKS COVER!!

  16. Igor says:

    Also, Yoko Ono is the prime example of everything that’s wrong with women. Pretends to be a freedom fighter, trying to show that women are as capable of men, but her only achievement in life is having married a successful man and being responsible for not his death, but the end of his life. She’s a living joke. And one that makes me cry.

  17. Igor says:

    John saw a mother figure in Yoko Ono. John suffered from borderline personality disorder. It’s clearly recognizable in the Beatles’ first albums, for example “You really got a hold on me” and “If I fell”.

    When they first met, she said she didn’t know his music because she didn’t want to admit the tiniest possibility that she had analyzed all of John’s lyrics and his interviews.

    John was her bitch because she acted as his mother. She was also older than him and looked even older than she was. Yoko is a manipulative cunt and the Beatles would have existed a lot longer without her. Yoko Ono is the real person who single-handedly ended the 60s, not Charles Manson.

    • Doric says:

      John was borderline, I missed this, I just did a post, same conclusions. I’m sure she has NPD herself and Julian thought she targeted John from the beginning, she got into his head and turned him. BDP/NPD relationships far too common and the consequences are devestating. That’s how I lost my best friend.

  18. Yoko is and always will be popular and people bow down to her for one reason and only one reason — she marries one of the most famous people in the world.she isnt very good looking, I’ve seen her so called ‘art’ ,she cant sing, unless you call those primal screams singing(and I dont) and she has no talent of any kind. I cant imagine what she would be doing for a living if she had not married john.

  19. Oko Yono says:

    John should be alive, that bitch should be dead.

  20. Johnny says:

    Yoyo was and is a horrible, evil and manipulative woman. She pursued Lennon relentlessly for one reason-he was rich, Now she has his fortune, but no respect or goodwill from any Beatles fans. When she dies, the truth of her sordid life will be told.

  21. Russ says:

    Thank You, now I know i am not alone in this…..Hey, I even found this by googling “What did John Lennon see in Yoko Ono”

  22. transylvanianmyth says:

    Something is definitely putrid in this woman’s brain…As Julian said , she knew exactly what she was doing . She was into black magic , she sold her soul to the devil , she hypnotized John left , right and centre….She’s a cunt.

  23. maybe john needed “a total zero”to share his blessings with,no matter what the price
    people sometimes get tired of the well off around them and do lift a total zero as far up as possible,AND that’s exactly some zeroes goal,to get way up as high as possible with the most minimal effort possible…a philosophy hard to contemplate,but try and imagine…

  24. Bia Castro says:

    OMG!!! This article is o good!! I really think you’re right John deserved someone way better than her! When i watched the video me and my brother kept laughing at her for a whole hour!

  25. I gotta say she looks like that Japanese ghost from the movie, “Grudge” and has similar vocals. She is the ugliest woman I’ve seen so far with most horrid personality and a horrifying vocal. I don’t what is she thinking when she’s doing that cesspit fecal material but it’s reasonable to take that she is on some kind of drugs. My dog’s fart sounds better that her singing and my five year old socks has better personality!

  26. Bob says:

    I cant comment on whether she “broke up the Beatles” so I won’t go there. I am basing why I think she is an IDIOT on the fact that, firstly, I am a musician. I think I have a sliver of musical ability. There are alot of musicians we may poke fun at….Abba, Meatloaf, Justin Timberlake….the fact remains they have TALENT and what they do is JUSTIFIABLE. Yoko, on the other hand has 0% talent. What has she EVER DONE that was musically justifiable? NOTHING. Watch videos of her….she interrupts the band(s) can’t sing, Screeches pretty well, she has NOTHING to contribute. Even her appearance is annoying. John Lennon was WHIPPED…she wore the pants. John HAD to let her POISON the music. I can see clearly how she may have pissed off George, Ringo and Paul, who were very talented. And now Yoko has all this fame and fortune undeservedly. Take for example the 80′s duo “WHAM!” What purpose did Andrew Ridgely serve? NOTHING! Just like Yoko…a big, FAT nothing. FUCK HER.

  27. Sheryl says:

    Great article! And you’re right on about Chuck Berry’s WTF was that noise look! She pursued Lennon, he gave up Cynthua and Julian for her. Laughable. What she has done to Julian and the way she has treated him since John’s death is inexcusable!

  28. Lia says:

    You are completly right this is what I think of her too.She is horrible and evil.

  29. steve says:

    Yes well if the writer wasnt so full of hate for this woman he may of come off a bit better

    • breakinbadd says:

      haha I apologize for coming off like that. I will admit that I do hate her work and what she did to the Beatles.

      • Gary says:

        You don’t apologize. You had the appropriate amount of anger. Maybe a little too much restraint. She was basically showing up at her boyfriends work and expecting to participate with zero qualifications. Which would be wrong for any job john lennon might have had. If you worked at subway and your girlfriend started making sandwichs you get fired.

        • john lennon says:

          i must say, i agree with most of these malodorous emanations, though i may not be able to personally elucidate my reasons. can any of you actually state:

          “why you are so concerned about WTF yoko ono is doing now?”

          this is an octogenarian of little significance in 2014 . for other than having erected “peace towers” what has she done? exactly, NAFT. no yoko, having your sycophants put together a book of smiles doesn’t cut it. you wanna talk avant guarde? check marina abramovic y’all.

          anyway, i find it exceedingly interesting that we are so vehement with our invectives against this woman. somehow she manages to suck the living hate out from every pore. but why? is she not a single voice? perhaps this is exactly the type of dialogue she wishes to induce, so that she can maintain her relevance. if so, it is fairly erudite.

          come to think of it, enough BS!

          i hate how she looks, how she sounds, how she manipulates, how she lies, how she cheats, and how all around ice-hearted she is!

          can you believe that she (sold and therefore) made julian buy back the postcards to his own father from auction! that she tried to foil julian’s record launch by orchestrating the simultaneous launch of sean’s record? and that she coupled that strategy with threatening radio stations to pull beatle rights if they played any of julian’s songs! that she gave julian only 100′s of dollars per month from his fathers’ near billion dollar estate claiming “he would only get himself into trouble”??!!!! have you ever heard of a TRUST you half-wit? (exactly, she’s no “half-wit”, she just thinks julian is–and that he would believe her greed would be masked by such an insipid rationale.

          this is john’s first born son folks, fighting to make a living for himself and his mother while yoko and sean basque shamelessly, unabashedly in john’s fortune.

          now, just when it seems it cannot get worse, cast a glance at the myriad of tasteless marketing schemes of john’s name and work! (like she needed the money!) then, a simple google search brings to light allegations that yoko ‘manipulated’ many of john’s original works for market! colorized them, etc.! now if that is true, for the life of me i cannot think of a single justification for this! it would be an unforgivable crime! at least work on a copy of the original and call it a joint project–why (allegedly) forge john’s hand?

          julian: “thank’s, yoko, for the john lennon mug you sent me for my birthday!” (that’s right, it what she sent him, while sending the more pricy pieces, engraved on marble, to yoko’s friends.)

          ok. yes. of course i see the reasons we hate this person. they are abundantly clear. although, as ironic as it may sound, i am against this sort of general gossip — that is, without giving a person the opportunity to respond. at last i reason that just as we found this site, so can she–so we have equal rights to this venue.

          anyway, yoko can take the money, buy the sycophants, live in the dakota, keep the private planes, and the publishing rights, etc., but she cannot fool the people. no no, not ever.

          “PEACE AND LOVE!?” yea, whatever yoko. more like “CASH AND CARRY”.

          MAN, i wish john were here.

          i wish he could have seen this.

          do any of you actually believe he would have withstood any of this? one clue will be the ‘lost weekend’ (actually 18 months) when john split with may pang! they were together at least a year and a half! so yoko, what kind of “true love” is that? NOT — just another one of yoke’s thinly veiled attempts to hijack history and brainwash the people.

          her only control was to give him room to get the hell away from her! and she was smart here. she’s obviously been reading her ancestors book, the art of war. maybe in her last life she was a he! miyamoto musashi!

          anyway, let me end this by now boring tirade, we know of your greed yoko! sneaking out to apple headquarters store, armed with arms full of garbage bags, cleaning out the place the night before paul, george, ringo, and their families even had a look! incredible! WHY?

          we know of your manipulations! sending endless pleas to john insisting that he “help” ($$$$$$$) your dying ideas take flight in order to save the world! and you say you didn’t even know the beatles? HAR HAR HAR!!! WHY?

          when your advances to paul (yep! true dat!) were declined, you hit up george, then finally john! did it not bother you at all that you had a daughter? kyoko!!? WHY?

          then you wonder why kyoko kept running away from you!!!! didn’t it bother you (at all!?) that the lads were married? that john had a son!!?? WHY?

          you just had to keep pushing until you got your way!

          well, here you are yoko, you “won” the battles–but what did you win?

          you won lots and lots of money, but you are miserable, aren’t you? WHY?

          because you know in your heart how you did it. and you know, that in spite of all your money and your company of sycophants, we, the people, know as well.

          i’ll be interested to see how much of sean’s inheritance yoko will squander in order to preserve her legacy and fight to make YOKO as important as john?

          do you really think yoko will keep john’s ashes a secret? haha!

          you watch, they will be pulled out and mingled with her own, then built into a huge memorial where anyone wishing to pay their respects to john, will be forced to face YOKO as well.

          this, in my mind, will be her last chance redeem her name, IMO.

          if she allows the populace (or even her son sean) to make their own decisions on the funeral, the monuments/memorials, etc, without undue influence from her personal army PR experts, then she will have gained a little respect from this author.

          that said, a mere 3 minutes and 17 seconds at:

          http://youtu.be/EaCKKHcpf0w

          would have been more that enough to make the case. this is a mere window onto the expansive land that is YOKO ONO.

          ps. anyone notice that like paul, she promulgates her own name while minimizing Lennon’s? if you disagree, why doesn’t she ever use her legal name? it’s yoko ono LENNON.

          come to think of it yea, FYO!!!!

          sorry, no time for proof-reading what will surely be a minefield of spelling/grammatical errors.

          JWno’O’L.

          • John Lennon Junior says:

            Dear John Lennon/Anon,

            your comment and declaration of pure frustration with putting up with 46 years of YO lies and bullshit is fantastic, thank you so very much for enlightening readers as to her conduct at Apple studios that reflects her true character.

            I ran into someone at a Beatles Fest who worked for Andy Warhol who off the record confirmed what I had heard, that YO was banned from Andy Warhol’s studio before going over to London to conquer John Lennon. After she and John moved to NYC, she was treated like rock royalty and was always welcome at Warhol’s studio with open arms. It makes me sick. She had burned all her bridges in NYC with the avant garde scene because she was not known so much as an artist in her own right, but as a “con-artist” one who rips off ideas from others. This was why she was banned from Andy Warhol’s studio along with having a notorious reputation for sleeping around.

            But I digress. She pays everyone off, she must be paying former livein gay boyfriend/lover Sam Hadvotay a small fortune to keep his mouth shut–Sam relocated back to Hungary far away from her.

            Has anyone taken a look at the similarity between childhood photos of Sean and a recent photo of David Spinozza, a former session guitarist who worked for John Lennon and was said to have an affair during the same time that John was on his “long lost weekend” with May Pang? Looks like Sean as a child resembles David much more than John. And it seems that Sean’s face has changed a lot, so that the adult Sean doesn’t look anything like the child he was. His eyes have changed, jawline/nose, why his face has changed so he looks like ….John Lennon.

            Could it be that his face has been deliberately changed via lots of plastic surgeries in this teens and 20s (and even 30s) ? What a horrible thing to do, to bully John back into a dead relationship for the sake of a baby that wasn’t even his own! OMG!

            here’s that photo of David in a rare interview from 2012. It’s very interesting that there are very few photos of him on the internet at all. Wonder if Yoko ended up paying him to go offline for nearly 40 years.

            http://www.guitarworld.com/session-guitar-my-interview-true-studio-guitar-royalty-david-spinozza

            now take a look at this rare side profile/front of a young 10 year old Sean, coincidentally done by Warhol, shortly before Warhol died in 1987:

            http://www.artvalue.com/auctionresult–warhol-andy-1928-1987-usa-sean-lennon-2947613.htm

            There are lots and lots of photos one can see where his face has literally metamorphosed into John’s, but he never looked like John as a young boy.

            So, how many plastic surgeries has he had to turn himself looking into John Lennon so no one ask the dreaded question: If Sean didn’t look like John’s son, whose son was he? I think the early photos of Seans compared to David Spinozza’s recent photo from 2012 answers that question.

            If anyone has any doubt that plastic surgery isn’t able to completely turn a face with Asian features into an Occidental or European face, take a look at these transformations here at several case studies feature Asians who want to look white, I’m sure that Sean qualifies for what he’s had done to him.

            http://www.oddee.com/item_98715.aspx

            I feel for Sean who has had to resort to surgery to change his face so he can get some attention as the “designated heir” to John’s fame and fortune. Poor kid, he was probably forced to undergo those surgeries by Yoko. If Sean had these surgeries before he became 18, she should be sued for child abuse at a minimum.

            BreakinBadd, are you man enough to post this?

            As Ringo says, Peace and Love man, Peace and Love!

          • John Lennon Junior says:

            Hi BreakinBadd, Just tried leaving a long comment, looks like it didn’t make it. Essentially looks like Sean’s had lots of plastic surgeries to look like his father, John Lennon, and that as a young boy, he looks a lot more like his mother, Yoko, but as a young boy, he really doesn’t look anything like John at all.

            In fact, he looks more like…that guitarist David Spinozza that Yoko was having an affair with while John was living with May Pang for 18 months. It seems David has gone off the grid of publicity since the mid-70s as there have been no photos I could find of him from the 70s/80s/90s except for this recent photo from an interview in Sept 2012:

            http://www.guitarworld.com/session-guitar-my-interview-true-studio-guitar-royalty-david-spinozza
            Notice how he won’t say anything about working with YO.

            Question: You also worked with Yoko Ono. Anything you’d like to say about it?
            Answer: “I certainly did and no.” (mind your own business)

            Could it be that Yoko paid David to stay out of sight, no photos and not to say a word about being a sperm donor?

            Here’s an Andy Warhol portrait done in 1986 of Sean with a rare side profile along with full face so Sean must have been only 10 years old:

            http://www.artvalue.com/auctionresult–warhol-andy-1928-1987-usa-sean-lennon-2947613.htm

            Again here’s another photo of a young Sean from 1987 (now he’s 12 years old) who looks more like the son of David Spinozza than John’s.

            several case studies feature Asians who want to look white, I’m sure that Sean qualifies for what he’s had done to him.
            http://www.oddee.com/item_98715.aspx

            Now look at some of these photos where Sean’s nose clearly has been changed so he also has a Lennon style “bump” like Julian:

            http://www.themichiganvoice.com/2012/09/artists-pledge-fracking/

            It’s quite clear that somewhere after Sean turned 12, his face started to change dramatically. Poor Sean who has spent a lifetime attempting to be someone else, to appear to be John Lennon junior when he isn’t even biologically related. Sean, I hate to break the news to you, but you’re the son of David Spinozza, not John Lennon’s son. So, it’s time for you to stop spending the rest of your life looking and being someone else that you’re not. good luck with that. best wishes for getting a life and an identity that isn’t controlled by your super control freak of a mother.

            • John Lennon Junior says:

              Oops this copy and pasted didn’t go through: here’s the photo of a 12 year old Sean Lennon who hasn’t had his face changed yet by a plastic surgeon’s knife:

              http://www.davidmcgough.com/photos.php?photo=2490&origin=%2Fphotos.php%3Fstart%3D1575

              You can really see how Sean’s nose, his face have been changed. Wow! OMG!

              His mother is looking worried that he’s not looking anything like the son of John, that someone might realize he’s not John’s son after all.

              • Sherlock Holmes says:

                check out this photo of the likely dad Spinozza;
                http://tinyurl.com/qjnrqdc

                you can see similarities with eyebrows, shape of the eyes and skin color to the 1987 photo of Sean. if this photo gets removed from the facebook photos, then look for “World Wildlife Benefit” & Spinozza. Apparently he didn’t want anything to do with YO per this article:

                http://thisrecording.com/today/2011/12/6/in-which-john-lennon-is-split-in-two.html

                Was It Just a Dream?

                by KATHRYN SANDERS

                One morning in August of 1973, Yoko Ono walked through her apartment in the Dakota into the office of the Lennons’ 22-year-old personal assistant, May Pang. Yoko closed the door and sat down. She lit a Kool. She told May that she and John weren’t getting along, which wasn’t a surprise to anyone who had been in the company of the Lennons during that time. She said she knew John would start seeing other women, and she was worried he would choose poorly, picking someone who would only use him. “You don’t have a boyfriend,” Yoko continued. May balked; she had no interest in John. He was her employer. He was married. “Don’t worry,” Yoko said, between puffs of her cigarette. “I’ll take care of everything.”

                Shortly afterward, John pursued May and they began a sexual relationship, shacking up in May’s studio apartment on the East side after evenings spent recording and mixing the album Mind Games. Despite the new dimension to their relationship, May continued working for the Lennons, helping John finish the album and acting as a gofer for Yoko. John was still officially living with his wife at the Dakota and it was starting to cramp his style, so in October, he and May headed to Los Angeles under the guise of promoting the album while staying in various friends’ homes.

                John wanted to do two things in LA – he wanted to sing on an album of songs that inspired him to become a musician, and he wanted to produce another artist. He wanted to make music, but he didn’t want to make John Lennon albums. For the former, he enlisted Phil Spector to produce his oldies record, and the latter, he chose Beatles’ pal Harry Nilsson, whom Lennon once called his “favorite American artist.”

                While preparing to record, John and May moved to a house in Santa Monica. Many of the other musicians were also friends who stayed in the house with them – Keith Moon, Klaus Voormann, and Ringo Starr, among others. Yoko called every day, usually multiple times, talking to John about everything from where she went shopping, how she was suicidal, her solo career, how she had a boyfriend. She wouldn’t say who it was, but John quickly guessed, and was right – David Alan Spinozza, a session guitarist who was working with Yoko on her latest album.

                Back in New York after completing Harry’s album Pussy Cats, John and May got their own apartment on East 52nd Street. Yoko still phoned them regularly. She initially had tried to talk them into getting their own apartment next to hers at the Dakota, an idea which May immediately vetoed. Meanwhile, Yoko’s solo album and career weren’t doing as well as she anticipated. She and David Spinozza had split up after he suggested Yoko stop using John’s money to produce her albums. He said that if she wanted to be an artist in her own right, she should stop using John’s name. She told David he was unsupportive.
                ===================================================

                So perhaps yoko figured out a way to for David to become an involuntary sperm donor without him having a clue that she was going to use it for later use at a fertility clinic in case she couldn’t get pregnant after getting back together again with John in Feb 1975. Perhaps she had it all mapped out in 1974 and early 1975 but the artificial insemination from a fertility clinic takes time…perhaps and that’s how the miracle baby Sean came to be.

Leave a Comment...