Government’s Benefit From Drunk Driving Laws
January 4, 2012 5 Comments
You are currently browsing comments. If you would like to return to the full story, you can read the full entry here: “Government’s Benefit From Drunk Driving Laws”.
January 4, 2012 5 Comments
You are currently browsing comments. If you would like to return to the full story, you can read the full entry here: “Government’s Benefit From Drunk Driving Laws”.
aarmagh you really must not be able to read, the article clearly states nothing about the death overall change in death rate loll dumbass stoner!
J, Dubs argument is that BAC is a total gov’t scam to make money with no benefit to society(us) and that is just not the case. You and everyone you have ever known are safer as a result of tougher laws regarding drinking and driving. Check out the NHTSA web site. Unlike Dubs, I’m not pulling the stats out of my butt. Dumbass, debatable, stoner,ya got me.High de,High de,Ho.Peace out.
That is not my argument at all. Summed up my argument is that lowering the legal BAC from .08 to .07 has such a minor significance that it is just significantly beneficial to the government robbing us of more money. that’s such a small difference in BAC that cognitively ability will be not altered too indifferently, yet that money more people who are caught within the range of what should be legally tolerable. I have had friends die in drunk driving accidents and the whole shaboozle and im not saying it lowering it to .08 didnt save lives but still believe them lowering it from .08 should have no significant difference in the fatality rate maybe i just phrased the article wrong but oh well…. hmm oh yeah and for the record i don’t smoke weed. PeAcE!
interesting post – and comments
I live in Arizona, which is a zero tolerance state. I knew someone who blew a .02 and was given a DUI. Insane!!!